God To Rule On Efficacy Of Thought And Prayer In Gender Identity

The upcoming Supreme Court term promises to delve into the very fabric of human existence, specifically the mysterious efficacy of divine intervention on one's internal sense of gender identity. Proponents, demonstrating an admirable commitment to faith-based diagnostics, eagerly await a ruling that could elevate fervent prayer to a legitimate — perhaps even superior — medical modality.

These earnest crusaders expect the nation's highest court to officially sanction the practice of *thought and prayer* as a frontline treatment, effectively bypassing the tedious, often contradictory, findings of empirical science. Arguments reportedly lean heavily on centuries of anecdotal success stories and the undeniable power of *really wishing* someone would reconsider who they are.

Critics, stubbornly clinging to outdated notions like "evidence-based medicine" and "informed consent," appear to misunderstand the profound spiritual efficacy of legislative fiat. Should the Court rule against the demonstrable power of wishful thinking, one can only assume the activists will simply pray for new justices, or perhaps for the entire concept of objective reality to be overturned in subsequent terms. After all, what is religious freedom if not the right to redefine biology by popular decree?